< IP News

CIPPIC v. Sahni: Can AI Be an Author? Federal Court to Decide

How does using artificial intelligence in creating a work affect copyright protection under Canadian law?

The Federal Court will now have to decide this question after the Samuelson-Glushko Canadian Internet Policy and Public Interest Clinic (“CIPPIC”) commenced a challenge to a Canadian copyright registration for an image called “Suryast”. The registration lists both the RAGHAV Artificial Intelligence Painting App and Mr. Ankit Sahni as co-authors. CIPPIC is arguing that the work lacks originality and that an AI program cannot be an “author” under Canadian law.

This challenge references the United States Copyright Office’s 2023 decision regarding an attempt in the United States to register copyright in the same image. There, the Copyright Office ruled that an AI program could not be an author. However, it is unclear how the Federal Court will deal with this question (applying Canadian law).

Issues surrounding AI authorship, such ownership of AI-generated works and an AI’s ability to assign or waive copyright, highlight the need for IP law to adapt to questions posed by novel technology.

A complete copy of the Notice of Application is available here.

NOT LEGAL ADVICE.
Information made available on this website in any form is for information purposes only. It is not, and should not be taken as legal advice. You should not rely on, or take or fail to take any action, based upon this information. Never disregard professional legal advice or delay in seeking legal advice because of something you have read on this website. Oyen Wiggs Green & Mutala LLP professionals will be pleased to discuss resolutions to specific legal concerns you may have.

Related Services

Related Industries