Following Apple’s smartphone design patent victory over Samsung in 2012, the parties continue their battle before a California district court over the calculation of damages relating to the finding of design patent infringement. Damages in design patent cases are based on profits made on the “article of manufacture,” which the US Supreme Court earlier found is “broad enough to embrace both a product sold to a consumer and a component of that product, whether sold separately or not”. Apple asserts that profits should be attributable to the sales of phones as a whole since they incorporate the infringing components, while Samsung assert that profits should be attributable to a lesser amount directly related to the value of the infringing components. See link to article.
< IP News
NOT LEGAL ADVICE.
Information made available on this website in any form is for information purposes only. It is not, and should not be taken as legal advice. You should not rely on, or take or fail to take any action, based upon this information. Never disregard professional legal advice or delay in seeking legal advice because of something you have read on this website. Oyen Wiggs Green & Mutala LLP professionals will be pleased to discuss resolutions to specific legal concerns you may have.